Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, shouts as President Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 4, 2025. (Win McNamee/Pool Photo via AP)
Conversation: “Democracy dies in decorum.” How the “strongbuddy” relationship between Musk and Trump is a new twist on authoritarianism needing new kinds of resistance— Anand Giridharadas and Ruth Ben-Ghiat, in the.ink
What is happening right now… is that those Senators and Members of Congress are happily giving away all Congressional authority and power to Donald Trump. They are siting silently, as Elon Musk, with his $13 billion of government contracts, uses whatever algorhythm he has to identify key words that he doesn’t like, and just starts cutting programs. We all would love to address waste, fraud, and abuse. We’d love to address government efficiency. But you cannot sit here, not a single one of my Republican colleagues can sit here and say you know what Elon Musk is cutting, that you know it to be waste, fraud, and abuse. You don’t: nobody does! He doesn’t even know if it’s waste fraud and abuse. Because there’s no investigation, there’s no evaluation. Instead, he’s just cutting.
And you all sit there silently: letting some unelected billionaire get access to our personal identification information, cut programs willy nilly, cut funding… potentially stop funding. I don’t understand… on what planet do you stop the funding for a program, and then investigate it? Why aren’t you investigating it while it continues, so the status quo can continue? So that Americans who rely on this money can continue to believe they will have this money. And in many cases that Congress appropriated, and designated, and obligated, and they’re stomping all over that down at 1600 Pennsylvania.
And there isn’t a single Republican member of Congress who’s willing to stand up for Congress. For us! For Congress! Just because Donald has designated Elon Musk to do the work, and you’re either afraid that Donald Trump will support a primary opponent, or you’re afraid that Elon Musk will put $10 million into a primary opponent. And so you happily turn over all of your own authority. What is the point of being here? Why do you run for office? Why do you want to be elected to Congress? So that you can bend the knee to the executive? So you can bend the knee to Donald Trump?
There’s no mandate for Congress hiding in a cave. The mandate is to address the issues that the American people are facing. Which is inflation, which are high costs, which is affordability. And if you want to address waste, fraud, and abuse, we’re happy to do it with you. The right way: by coming back to Congress, and showing us what’s wasteful, what’s fraudulent, what’s abuse. So that we can vote, as the owners of the power of the purse, to make those decisions.
Everybody knows that Trump’s victory was not a mandate that has not been seen in many decades. And Trump goes on to talk about how all of a sudden we finally have most Americans believing the country is headed in the right direction rather than the wrong one….
The point of these kinds of lies, which are so easy to check, is, one, to overwhelm the system’s faculties of truth. At a certain point, you give up.
This is what it means, as Steve Bannon said, to “flood the zone” of [expletive]. You can check a couple of lies if all you’re doing is checking every sentence of a two-hour speech. You’re going to bore your audience and yourself.
These are more like what was happening when Trump made Sean Spicer go out in the first term and say it was the largest inauguration crowd ever. It is a way of cleaving reality into two. These lies are loyalty tests. They’re ways of getting people who accept them — JD Vance chuckling right behind him — further and further into the con.
Because once you’ve given up so much of yourself, once you’ve traded little shred of dignity after little shred of dignity, once you’ve accepted these cruelties and outrageous things you would not have thought you would have accepted a couple of years before — at a certain point, you’re in too deep, you’ve gone too far. You’ve cut yourself off from old sources of support, from old versions of your own internal ethic and your own internal self-esteem and self-conception.
And now really all you have as a Republican politician or a staffer is the success of Donald Trump. You’ve thrown so much money into this that it really better work out.
That’s what I think this lying is. It’s really not about Donald Trump trying to give you a sense of the world. He knows perfectly well that people can see what is happening to the stock market. They don’t think on that particular day: We are in a new golden age where everything is going great.
What he is doing is breaking the system into those who are loyal to him and those who are not, and then those who are not can be sort of purged — at least if they’re on the Republican side — one by one by one by one.
The stars of ‘Oppenheimer,’ ‘The Brutalist,’ ‘Anora’ and ‘Poor Things’ deserve their accolades, but there’s a disturbing pattern here…
If Kamala Harris were president right now, these wins might merit a shrug. But given that every branch of the U.S. government and now military is currently headed up by a person possessed of XY chromosomes who has been held liable for sexual abuse, and his cabinet includes multiple men accused of sexual assault, it’s difficult not to conclude that, even outside of Hollywood, women have been demoted.
Hollywood, too, has done better in the past. Between 2021 and 2023, Michelle Yeoh, Frances McDormand, and Jessica Chastain won Oscars for playing a sci-fi warrior, a nomadic widow, and a televangelist, respectively. And in the recent past, we’ve seen top actresses take star turns as larger-than-life figures like Katherine Graham, Queen Elizabeth, and Erin Brockovich….
Going into this year’s Oscars, the big question was whether Madison would win for best actress or the honor would go to 1980s “it-girl” Demi Moore for her unsettling performance in the horror film The Substance. Playing an over-50 TV fitness instructor who is laid off for age-related reasons, Moore is so desperate to reclaim her lost youth that she willingly injects a mysterious substance into herself, which causes her to violently vacate her body and intermittently inhabit that of a dewy woman half her age (played by Margaret Qualley). Insofar as Moore’s character soon discovers that everyone wants a piece of her nubile self, not her authentic menopausal one, it appeared to some moviegoers this week that the Oscar going to 25-year-old Madison, not 62-old Moore, precisely mirrored the message of the movie.
But the larger irony here may be that Moore and Madison’s roles aren’t that far apart: Both presume a universe where a woman’s only value lies in her firm flesh and sexual allure, her character and intellect be damned. This is also a universe in which female friendship and camaraderie are either nonexistent or in short supply.
It’s the job of the Oscars to celebrate the best performances, wherever they are found. And both Madison and Stone were stand-outs. But the film world also needs to consider its role in reinforcing this backlash moment — a moment where the Manosphere has replaced #MeToo. And the only women who appear to have political power are Barbified stooges and mouthpieces for a president who, in addition to being a budding autocrat and sex pest, once owned beauty pageants. Trump is also known for rating women’s bodies on a scale of 1 to 10, as if they were show horses, and not human beings.
Given the current dystopia, any cause for celebration should be embraced. Still, it matters what is being celebrated. Right now, we need more stories about women triumphing in all sorts of arenas, not just ones that insist on reducing them to sexual objects. Hollywood, get on it!
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. Andrew Harnik/AP Photo
ENGAGE:
Come On!:Democrats: This Is War: Isn’t It About Time You Started Acting Like It? — Michael Tomasky. “No, Democrats. No sitting around and waiting for things to change. Help make them change. Public opinion will shift more quickly if you kindle that shift… Democrats rarely try to force a change in the way voters see an issue. They rarely play the role of disruptors. Well, folks, if ever history was grabbing you by the lapels and demanding that you do some disrupting, it’s now. And if the hearts and minds of the working class constitute the main front in our political battle, how about a weekly press conference by Democrats ticking off the ways in which the administration has made things worse for working-class people? Trump has stripped the National Labor Relations board of a quorum, meaning that it can’t defend workers’ rights. People don’t care? Nonsense. Choose a couple emotionally charged examples that will make them care.”
Fear, Chaos and Capture:Trump’s American Takeover —Amicus Podcast, with Dahlia Lithwick, an interview with Kim Lane Scheppele, Trump’s moves follow the authoritarian playbook in Hungary, Russia, Venezuela, in which an authoritarian is democratically elected, changes the constitution, and then cancels all legal precedents. “It’s important to keep toeholds that you can use to leverage into more power for the opposition… civil sector groups, state governments in blue states, anything that has not yet been captured… we should lean into the parts of the government that are not gonna go down without a fight…. look at where public outrage can at least gum up the works. Everything that this administration does now that is bringing down democracy and causing pain should be met with friction. You may not be able to stop it, but you can slow it down.”
Scapegoats:Trump’s Boogeyman: D.E.I.— The New Yorker Radio Hour Podcast. David Remnick interviews Jelani Cobb, Dean of Columbia School of Journalism, who says: “Morale is not great [among journalists]. We should never allow young or emerging journalists to have the idea that there’s a one to one relationship between our effort and the outcome…. We don’t know what the ratio is — it’s unknowable, unpredictable, completely random. And my version of encouragement has been that we keep doing the work until we get to that breakthrough moment where it actually really, really does make a difference.”
Move Fast and Break Things.How WIRED Magazine is Scooping the Competition, plus Whither the Democrats? On the Media Podcast. Brook Gladstone interviews Ezra Levin, of Indivisible, on Congressional Democrats’ “Stop the Steal” bill: “Nobody with even a passing understanding or familiarity with how Congress works, believes this bill is ever gonna get a vote; nobody believes if this bill got a vote that it would pass; nobody believes that if it passed that Donald Trump would sign it; nobody believes that if he vetoed it that Congress would override it; and nobody believes that if Congress even succeeded in overriding it, that Trump would agree to implement it. What this bill does is say, ‘I’m Chuck Schumer, I’m Hakeem Jeffries: I care.’ I don’t care that you care; I care that you’re using the power available to you.” Indivisible suggests using Mitch McConnell’s playbook to push back.
If you have the stomach to think about what is happening, read on. If you’d rather skip the news, and immerse yourself in something else, skip ahead to the ESCAPE section.
Podcast: On the Media: Wars are Won By Stories — Brooke Gladstone interviews Elyse Graham, author of Book and Dagger – How Scholars and Librarians Became the Unlikely Spies of World War Two
Idea: “Dobbs was never self-limiting to abortion—it was a save-the-date card for the religious right’s plan to come for the rest of our reproductive freedoms. …
This is the two-step wherein the state forces women to have babies they cannot raise, does nothing to help support them, then swoops in to seize the babies when their parents are seen as endangering them—a phenomenon that of course predominantly hurts poor women and women of color. The state also ensures that adoptions flow in the direction of more “worthy” parents, which means heterosexual and Christian parents, a regime also built into the legal framework. The list of people who cannot assert autonomy and control over their potential children has, in the course of a few weeks, now expanded from LGBTQ+ parents, single parents, poor parents, and parents of color to anyone who has started the process of IVF in Alabama.” —The IVF Ruling Is About Who Gets to Raise Your Children— Dahlia Lithwick in SLATE.
Valerie Block 